First-Day Orders

During President Trump's inauguration celebration, he signed a sweeping series of executive orders that set an aggressive tone for his administration's future. We have grouped these directives into three primary categories: national security and sovereignty, administrative reforms, and cultural and economic policy. Each category reflects a distinct aspect of the administration’s priorities, marking a distinct departure from the previous administration's policies. Executive orders have long been a tool for presidents to swiftly redirect the government and set their agenda. President Obama utilized executive orders to advance priorities such as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, which provided protections for undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children, and expanded environmental regulations under the Clean Power Plan. President Biden followed suit, signing a flurry of executive orders upon taking office to reverse many Trump-era policies, including rejoining the Paris Climate Agreement and halting construction on the southern border wall. Even earlier, President George W. Bush used executive orders to centralize counterterrorism efforts after 9/11, creating the Department of Homeland Security and implementing the USA PATRIOT Act. These examples illustrate how executive orders serve as a mechanism for presidents to assert their vision for the federal government. President Trump’s actions are no exception, signaling a sharp pivot toward his administration’s objectives.

President Trump’s initiatives, however, stand out for their unique emphasis on restoring traditional governance principles and focusing inward on national priorities. Unlike Obama’s push for progressive policies or Biden’s attempt to reverse conservative reforms, Trump’s executive orders signal a reassertion of sovereignty and efficiency, aiming to redefine the federal government’s relationship with its citizens and global partners. His focus on national security and sovereignty—from declaring a border "invasion" to targeting cartels as terrorist organizations—marks a more aggressive stance on domestic safety. Administrative reforms, such as eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion programs, indicate a shift toward meritocratic values and operational efficiency, contrasting with the equity-driven approach of prior administrations. Culturally and economically, Trump’s directives to restore traditional place names and prioritize resource independence reflect an agenda rooted in patriotism and self-reliance. These actions collectively signal a federal government pivoting away from globalist frameworks to a posture centered on national interest and American exceptionalism.

Advertisement

---

National Security and Sovereignty

National security and sovereignty are recognized as the foundational responsibilities of any government, encompassing efforts to protect the nation’s borders, citizens, and interests from external threats. A government has to ensure it is preventing criminal organizations or foreign adversaries from exploiting vulnerabilities and maintaining the integrity of state and federal governance. In practical terms, national security includes policies and actions that safeguard the safety of individuals and uphold the sovereignty of the country—the ability to govern independently without undue influence from external forces. Sovereignty reflects the principle that a nation’s government has the authority to make decisions in the best interest of its people. Together, national security and sovereignty serve as cornerstones for stability and prosperity, allowing the government to fulfill its obligations to protect and serve its citizens. In this context, the administration’s focus is evident in three targeted security initiatives that underscore its priorities for this area:

1. Guaranteeing the States Protection Against Invasion This executive order declares the southern border crisis an “invasion,” invoking constitutional provisions to justify emergency measures. It empowers federal agencies to suspend the entry of individuals deemed threats to public health, safety, or national security. By framing the issue as a matter of sovereignty, the administration underscores its commitment to border enforcement and state protection. This approach contrasts sharply with the previous administration’s focus on expanding asylum access and humanitarian efforts.

2. Protecting the United States From Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security Threats This order establishes enhanced vetting procedures for immigrants and visitors to ensure that no individuals entering the U.S. pose risks to the nation’s security. It mandates inter-agency collaboration to identify and mitigate potential threats. The administration’s emphasis on preemptive measures reflects a strategic pivot toward heightened vigilance, providing reassurance about the government's proactive approach to national security.

3. Designating Cartels and Other Organizations as Foreign Terrorist Organizations This directive targets international cartels and transnational criminal organizations, designating them as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) or Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGTs). By equating the operations of cartels with acts of terror, the order expands the legal tools available to law enforcement, highlighting the administration’s commitment to tackling border-related crime with urgency and precision, thereby enhancing the audience's sense of security about the government's law enforcement efforts.

These actions strongly focus on national security, sovereignty, and border integrity. By addressing illegal immigration, transnational crime, and terrorism, the administration aims to reassert control over the nation’s borders while prioritizing the safety of its citizens, thereby reassuring the audience about the government's commitment to protecting the nation's borders.

Administrative Reforms and Efficiency

Administrative reforms and efficiency focus on improving the government's operations, ensuring it functions effectively and responsibly in serving its citizens. The primary focus will be to evaluate outdated systems, eliminate inefficiencies, and restructure processes to align with modern needs. Administrative reform is about creating a government that delivers services promptly and equitably, cutting down on waste and needless bureaucracy. Who knows—maybe one day we’ll bid farewell to local DMVs and their unrivaled efficiency. Efficiency in governance means ensuring that public resources—time, money, and labor—are used wisely to maximize benefits for the public. We need reforms that aim to rebuild institutions by demonstrating accountability and prioritizing competence and service. When successful, administrative reforms will create a government that is more effective, transparent, and responsive to the needs of its people. In this context, the administration’s focus is evident in three targeted reform initiatives that underscore its priorities for this area:

1. Reforming the Federal Hiring Process and Restoring Merit to Government Service This order overhauls federal hiring practices by emphasizing merit, skills, and competence. It explicitly dismantles diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs, which the administration views as ideologically driven and counterproductive. The directive seeks to reestablish a merit-based approach to public service, reflecting a broader effort to streamline and depoliticize government operations.

2. Establishing and Implementing the President’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Known as the “DOGE Agenda,” this initiative creates a framework to modernize federal technology and optimize agency operations. Restructuring the U.S. Digital Service into the U.S. DOGE Service is intended to improve efficiency and accountability across federal agencies. Specialized teams within agencies will focus on implementing these reforms, signaling a comprehensive effort to enhance governmental performance.

3. Ending Radical and Wasteful Government DEI Programs and Preferencing This directive eliminates DEI-related initiatives across the federal government. It mandates the closure of DEI offices and the termination of associated programs and policies. The administration contends that such initiatives foster inefficiency and discrimination, advocating instead for a focus on competence and constitutional principles.

These reforms reflect the administration’s determination to modernize government operations, restore public trust, and prioritize effectiveness over ideology. They represent a clear departure from the previous administration’s equity-driven policies, signaling a return to traditional values of meritocracy and operational efficiency.

Advertisement

---

Cultural and Economic Policy

Cultural and economic policy focuses on shaping the identity of a nation and ensuring its prosperity by leveraging its resources, values, and traditions. Culturally, these policies aim to preserve and celebrate the historical and societal elements that define a country’s character, fostering a sense of unity and pride among its people. Economically, they address how a nation utilizes its resources to build a stable and thriving economy, including strategies for job creation, energy independence, and sustainable development. By aligning cultural values with economic strategies, such policies can strengthen a nation’s global position while prioritizing its citizens' well-being. Cultural and economic policy shape a country's identity and future trajectory. In this context, the administration’s focus is evident in three targeted policy initiatives that underscore its priorities for this area:

1. Restoring Names That Honor American Greatness This order reinstates traditional place names, such as renaming Denali back to Mount McKinley, to preserve American heritage. The administration frames this action as an effort to honor historical legacies and promote national pride, contrasting with the prior administration’s emphasis on multiculturalism and progressive narratives.

2. Unleashing Alaska’s Extraordinary Resource Potential Recognizing Alaska’s untapped natural wealth, this directive removes restrictions on energy development in the state. It prioritizes advancing energy projects, including liquefied natural gas (LNG), to bolster the nation’s economic and energy security. The administration aims to reduce reliance on imports and assert energy independence by fostering resource utilization.

3. America First Policy Directive to the Secretary of State This order directs the Department of State to realign its policies with an “America First” philosophy. By prioritizing American interests in diplomatic efforts, the administration underscores its commitment to sovereignty and self-reliance, distancing itself from the previous administration's globalist approach.

These cultural and economic initiatives underscore the administration’s dedication to promoting American exceptionalism and self-reliance. By linking cultural heritage to economic growth, the directives aim to inspire unity and leverage domestic resources for strategic advantage.

President Trump’s January 20 executive orders provide a positive and productive roadmap for a governance approach centered on security, efficiency, and cultural pride. These directives emphasize a return to traditional values, robust border enforcement, and a streamlined government committed to serving its citizens effectively. The administration’s priorities reflect a vision designed to address immediate challenges while reinforcing long-term principles of sovereignty and self-reliance.

As these orders take effect, their impact on governance and policy will shape the nation’s trajectory. Supporters view them as necessary corrections to inefficiencies and ideological overreach, while critics warn of potential divisiveness and unintended consequences. Regardless of perspective, these actions signal a transformative era in federal leadership that seeks to redefine the role of government in the United States of America and its place on the global stage.